This is democracyow democracynow.org the Warren peace report. I’m Amy Goodman. United States is continuing to bombard Iran amidst an intensifying standoff over the Strait of Hormuz. On Sunday, US Central Command said the US had struck 140 targets in Iran.
In retaliation, Iran’s Revolutionary Guard said they had targeted US military facilities in Bahrain and Kuwait, destroyed radar systems in Oman, and hit fuel tanks and ammunition depots at Prince Hassan air base in Jordan. The escalating attacks come after Iran announced the closure of the Strait of Hormuz and President Trump declared the ceasefire over. On Monday, Iran’s foreign minister said the United States had violated various parts of theou, the memorandum of understanding since the ceasefire began, including regarding control of the straight of Hormuz. >> Under article 5 of the memorandum of understanding, our effort was to work with Oman to establish a mechanism to ensure the safe passage of ships through the strait of Hormuz. Unfortunately, this did not materialize because of overt and covert US pressure on Oman.
Meanwhile, the United States is claiming Iran had violated theou. This is the US ambassador to NATO, Matthew Whitaker, on Fox News Sunday. Commercial shipping can’t be terrorized in the straight of Hormuz. And obviously, the memorandum of understanding between the parties was always performance-based. and that President Trump if uh shipping is attacked or if if the Iranians want to act belligerent then he will respond with overwhelming force.
For more we’re joined by investigative journalist Jeremy Scill, co-founder of Drop Site News. He’s been closely following the negotiations. Thanks so much for joining us again, Jeremy. As uh the US hits missile and defense systems and paramilitary revol uh revolutionary uh guard boats in a new round of attacks and Iran retaliates by hitting quote additional enemy bases in the region. Is this an escalation?
>> Without question, it’s an escalation. In fact, Donald Trump uh quite bluntly multiple times over the past few days said that the ceasefire is over. He also implied that the memorandum of understanding that was signed between the United States and Iran was effectively dead in the water. But then he backtracked from that and falsely claimed that the Iranians were again begging him to talk. This has been a recurring narrative where uh Trump for reasons that have to do with market manipulation or wishful thinking uh promotes to the public the idea that the Iranians are somehow just sitting in Tehran uh begging Donald Trump to come back to the table when reality um paints a very different picture.
Le let’s let’s back up and and and summarize what’s happened here on February 28th based uh on a combination of tainted Israeli intelligence, wishful thinking, imperial hubris um and a belief that uh the United States can use its military to achieve any objective around the world. Donald Trump, for the first time since the Islamic Revolution in 1979, uh stood as the American president that openly vowed to wage a war of regime change against uh Iran using military means. The Iranian government had said uh for months leading up to that February 28th initiation of this war that it was not going to just uh calibrate its response and engage in back channel communications with the United States when it decided to attack US military sites in the region because prior to this February 28th war, Iran uh had tried to um to have its responses to the US and Israeli attacking it be proportionate and aimed at not spurring or sparking a bigger war. This time they said they weren’t going to do that. And for weeks on end, the Iranians fought back, not one but two nuclear powers.
Uh Pete Haggsath and other American officials, including Donald Trump, were every day proclaiming that the Iranian ballistic missile capability had been overwhelmingly wiped out, that its drone capability had been overwhelmingly wiped out, that the Iranians were begging Donald Trump to make a deal. And all of that was just one massive lie. And so what happened is that Donald Trump was facing a very severe crisis with his quagmire. And what he did is engage in a memorandum of understanding that uh quite overwhelmingly favored the Iranian position. And I think what we witnessed here was that Trump did this because he felt like we’ll let the Iranians think they’re getting away with it, but we have no intention of actually abiding by the terms of this memorandum of understanding.
That’s why you immediately saw the United States try to open a parallel track in Lebanon. Um Lebanon was supposed to be party to this agreement that the United States signed. And instead, what the US and Israel have tried to do is to co-opt the Lebanese government to have its armed forces serve as an Israeli USD directed and backed counterterrorism quote unquote force that is responsible for uh dismantling and disarming Hezbollah. And in fact, that framework that they thrust upon the Lebanese government um allows the Israelis to remain indefinitely in southern Lebanon. Um the other aspect of this, Amy, is the situation in the straight of Hormuz.
There is no question, objectively speaking, that it’s the United States that’s been violating the terms of this agreement. It is quite explicit that Iran is supposed to have managing authority of the Strait of Hormuz, that it had deferred imposing any kind of fees for a 60-day period, and that a long-term solution was going to be the result of bilateral negotiations between the Islamic Republic of Iran and the Sultanate of Oman, the two literal states in the Strait of Hormuz. And what Donald Trump and the United States tried to do was say, “Well, we’re going to now cut a side deal with Oman, and we’re going to open this other corridor.” And yeah, the Iranians can be in charge of this small slice of the straight of Hormuz that happens to be just off their coast, but we’re actually going to have unrestricted access that completely uh obviates or eliminates any kind of Iranian management. And the Iranians have made clear that they’re not going to accept this.
And so the broader narrative is somehow that Iran wakes up one day and decides to just start attacking vessels in the straight of Hormuz. From the Iranian perspective, the United States is in systematic violation of multiple terms of the memorandum of understanding. You know, I spoke over the weekend to a senior Iranian official who said that what the United States and the Trump administration did over the past few days was to engage in a psychological operation using uh prominent media organizations in the United States, specifically Axios and CBS. The stories that were pushed by the White House was that Iranian officials had somehow come to Trump and confessed to him that these uh strikes on these vessels in the Straight of Hormuz were the result of a rogue faction of the IRGC and that it doesn’t represent the policy of Iran and that the Iranians plan to make some announcement with the Omanis that they’re going to allow an opening of an alternative corridor that’s not going to be under Iranian control. And the Iranians told me, and these are Iranian officials that are directly involved with these negotiations, that all of this was just a concoction of the United States.
And then in fact, the Omani government, which by the way, Trump threatened to wipe the the state of Oman off the map not that many weeks ago, that Oman has enormous pressure being put on it by the United States. And so, you know, Iran typically has good relations with Oman, but I think it’s notable that in the response uh the retaliatory strikes that Iran launched over the past couple of days um against US military bases in Kuwait, in Bahrain, in Jordan, they also struck targets inside of uh Oman. Now, you know, the the Pentagon is often very secretive throughout Democratic and Republican administrations. But what we’ve seen under the Trump administration is that US Sentcom, Central Command, and the Pentagon at large have concealed the impact of Iranian strikes in some cases entirely. We don’t know the facts to this day of certain things that happened in the first days of this uh war in terms of US damages taken in the region, but also slow walking any public revelations.
The Iranians are claiming that they struck a number of key strategic drone facilities and missile launch sites in the Persian Gulf. And so in in summary, what I would say is that Trump, I think, has dramatically underestimated the Iranians from the very beginning. He’s engaged in imperial hubris, wishful thinking. He certainly is announcing that this ceasefire is blown up. But the reality at the end of the day is that Iran is not going to capitulate.
Trump is used to his bullying tactics working on a domestic political level, certainly within the Republican party, but also on a global level in other deals that he’s pushed through. He engages in blackmail, bribery, um, coaxing, uh, and lying, and most of all, threats of force to try to achieve his agenda. Look what he’s done with NATO, uh, countries. So, the Iranians are really the first major power that has stood up to Trump and said, “Two things. We’re not going to give you some kind of fake victory narrative just so you know all the stuff that goes on behind the scenes is they say to the Iranians and I get this from Iranian sources just give Trump this, you know, just toss him this chip and everything is going to be okay.
And the Iranians are saying no, we’re not going to do that. Quite to the contrary, the Iranians have shown that they are willing to face the prospect of Trump reescalating this to a dramatic uh degree because they believe that they won this war on a tactical level and that they don’t need to concede anything to Donald Trump. This is the US ambassador to NATO, Matthew Whitaker, telling CNN’s Jack Jake Tapper on Sunday that President Trump’s a peacemaker and Iran is controlled by a bunch of crazy people. >> Jake, and he wants a deal with Iran. He wants to make sure that they never have a nuclear weapon, that they join uh the world as a a contributor and a a normalized country.
But right now it’s, you know, as President Trump has said and Marco Rubio has also stated, you know, this country is controlled by a bunch of uh crazy people and ultimately, you know, they’re going to have to understand the United States is very serious about this and will continue to be cleareyed on the threats. >> So that’s US Ambassador NATO Matthew Whitaker. Jeremy. >> Well, as I’ve talked about on this program before, you know, the Iranians some weeks ago started enlisting the services of senior psychologists to help them uh help the Iranian negotiators in their communications to Donald Trump because they think that he is clinically mentally ill that they’re dealing with a sociopathic erratic individual. And I think just objectively anyone who witnesses the public conduct of Donald Trump and then compares it to the quite whatever you think about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s politics, its internal policies, you can’t argue that it’s not uh a ser a set of rational actors with institutions that uh operate in a quite predictable manner.
The Iranians have a track record during this war of saying what they mean and then doing what they’ve said. Donald Trump is all over the map. He has multiple times threatened to bomb a multi-millennia old civilization. He threatened to wipe out an American ally, Oman, the premier multi-deade mediator between the United States and Iran on the nuclear issue. Um, Donald Trump is functioning as a toddler throwing a tantrum and then some incredibly dangerous wararmonger in the world where he’s raising the spectre of wiping out entire civilizations, of bombing the clearly identified civilian infrastructure of countries.
So I would say at the at the end of the day, you know, what what I think kind of captures the essence of this is when we’ve had negotiations between the United States and Iran, the Iranians have showed up with a uh a team of people, most of whom have PhDs and are subject area experts. Donald Trump, with the exception of JD Vance, sends people that overwhelmingly are showing up with last week’s golf scores and their investment portfolios. And so I think the situation that we find ourselves in right now is that Donald Trump is again throwing this tantrum. He’s threatening all sorts of things. He’s saying that the deal is off.
My understanding from Iranians, uh, Iranian officials is that the mediators are saying that he really does want an offramp in this. He doesn’t know how to handle it. He can’t fabricate a victory narrative. And they’re asking the Iranians to help in that effort. And I just don’t see the Iranians doing it.
I think they’re going to uh remain entrenched in their position that it’s the United States that needs to deescalate. And that Iran has discovered, and it’s known this for years, but it never deployed it. That uh a weapon more powerful in many ways than a nuclear weapon in the hands of the Iranian state is their ability to impact the global economy by their management and domination of the Strait of Hormos. Um, Jeremy, before we talk about the death of South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham, I just want to ask you very quickly about the Justice Department subpoening four journalists at the New York Times delivering these subpoenas to their homes on Friday night after they reported President Trump’s new Air Force One lacked key security features, including advanced anti-missile capabilities. This is the Boeing aircraft do uh donated to Trump by cutter which he’s taking with him after he leaves.
Says it’s it’ll be um uh at the Trump presidential library. Um he flew the plane to NATO but didn’t fly it back. He took the Air Force One home due to security concerns. Now, a number of news organizations have reported this. Uh, but the Times has been subpoenaed and very interestingly subpoenaed by Jay Clayton, the US attorney here in Manhattan, who’s been nominated by Trump to serve as director of national intelligence.
His confirmation hearing is on Wednesday. Jeremy, >> you know, I mean, what what we’re seeing here is an escalating war against journalists. I mean, we we of course saw this under uh President Bush, President Obama, the use of the Espionage Act, but what we’re seeing here really is the kind of organized crime family kingpin in chief. And Donald Trump believes that he can use the levers of American power to settle his personal scores. You know, he’s it’s like the equivalent, the journalistic or free speech equivalent of putting out a hit on the free press.
That’s really what we’re witnessing here. You know, today they come for the New York Times and tomorrow they’re going to come for uh other news organizations and other journalists. I mean that we are facing a very dire threat to press freedom under President Donald Trump right now. There’s no question about it. Amy, >> thanks for watching Democracy Now on YouTube.
Subscribe to the channel and turn on notifications to make sure you never miss a video. And for more of our audience supported journalism, go to democracynow.org or where you can download our news app, sign up for our newsletter, subscribe to the daily podcast, and so much
Read More: This Is NOT What We Expected… | Daily Rockets News & Rumors
